Search for: "DOES, Defendants, Partnerships. Corporations 1-10"
Results 1 - 20
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2018, 2:36 pm
Section 62(1)(b) provides that a partner may unilaterally dissolve a partnership, without violating the partnership agreement, if the agreement does not state a “definite term or particular undertaking. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
The statute applies to limited partnership formed on or after July 1, 1991, and those formed earlier who elected to adopt the Revised Limited Partnership Act. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
Schecter, as recently affirmed by the First Department: “[T]he signed, amended, and restated limited partnership agreement that is dated as of October 1 of 2016 [] does utterly refute the claims that are in this complaint in every regard. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
Justice Scarpulla’s recent decision sided with the defendants. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
The Board Approves a Freeze-Out Merger Last month, out of the blue, Defendant, who serves as President and controls two of the three seats on the board, sent Trustor, the third director and Vice President, a notice of special meeting of the board to approve resolutions (1) authorizing a merger of the Company with a special purpose entity formed by Defendant as sole owner to merge with and into the Company, and (2) removing Trustor as an officer. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:19 pm
See id. at *10. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm
Sedgwick Properties at ¶ 10. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm
In this case, Cellco Partnership and Airtouch Cellular had mixed success in defending their work rules against alleged 8(a)(1) violations. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:22 am
Pokoik’s complaint asserted direct and derivative claims alleging that the defendants used depressed appraisals of the property in fixing the rent payable by the affiliated lessee for a 10-year renewal term commencing in 2015. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:22 am
Pokoik’s complaint asserted direct and derivative claims alleging that the defendants used depressed appraisals of the property in fixing the rent payable by the affiliated lessee for a 10-year renewal term commencing in 2015. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 5:01 am
” Does the money go back to the corporations? [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:14 pm
§ 78u-4(b)(1). [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
Const. art. 1, § 15. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
1. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:42 am
Blake, District JudgeHoldings: (1) Personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state entity can be shown when a related entity transacts business in Maryland and the out-of-state entity does not maintain separate books and records, accounting procedures and directors’ meetings from the related entity. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:00 pm
(hereinafter "UCC") and Does 1 to 100, inclusive, was a corporation, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, and/or limited liability corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California and doing business in the County of Sacramento, State of California, with its current principal place of business located at 1234 Main Street, West Sacramento, California and is an employer… [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 7:17 pm
The OEIGWG held its first session from 6 to 10 July 2015. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:58 pm
Moraga (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 1, 9–10, offers little guidance to either side: it expressly leaves undecided whether a spouse’s suit seeking damages for violation of the Civil Rights Act would trigger § 973’s “immediate benefit” waiver. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm
How Does a Corporation Commit a Crime? [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:53 am
The Delaware action asserted common law claims; the Southern District of New York alleges that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
